Heard a disappointing story this afternoon in an audio comment from Rob Cottingham on Episode 183 of the For Immediate Release podcast.
It was a story about a blog that almost was — and a blog that should have been — for the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada. A publishing plan had been put in place. IT questions had been settled. A social-media strategy for using the blog as boost for the Canadian arts scene had been established.
And then, two days before the blog was due to launch, the big bad boys from marketing got cold feet and squashed the project. Why?
Because “[the museum] want[ed] to ensure that there is a solid strategic angle for our entire audience development strategy.”
So what does that mean, exactly?
Here is how Kate Trgovac might translate that sentence:
Sounds like an organization — or an individual — that when push finally came to shove, just couldn’t embrace the full set of responsibilities that comes with blogging.
What a waste a of a brilliant idea.
Technorati Tags: Rob Cottingham, Kate Trgovac
3 Responses
Bryan
26|Oct|2006 1Testing to see if audio goes into the blog …
David Jones
27|Oct|2006 2Funny thing. I blogged about how the Art Gallery of Ontario was using social media in a post earlier this year.
http://www.prworks.ca/index.php/bloggers-treated-like-media-at-frank-gehry-newser/
The AGO and ROM are certainly in competition for the culture/entertainment dollar in Toronto…I guess we’ll have to wait and see who wins.
Rob Cottingham
29|Oct|2006 3It’s a heartbreaking story… especially if the rest of the content the site’s creators had teed up was anything like the sample that Kate offers on her site.
Going public with a story like this isn’t an easy decision, and we rarely hear the stories about great projects that get the axe. All the more reason I’m glad this came out, and thankful for the opportunity to learn from it.
Thanks for blogging about this, Bryan!
Leave a reply