12 Oct
Posted by: Bryan in: Best practices, Worst practices
In just a couple of hours I’ll be phoning up a PR agency on the West Coast and could very well be saying yes to a pitch that found its way into our Monster e-mail inboxes earlier this week.
And here’s the thing: The pitch wasn’t very good.
For starters, we are addressed as “Hi Corporate” — you can’t get much sloppier than that. (I can hear Scott Monty telling me now, “Don’t read another word!”)
Next, the PR pro — who works at an agency that sponsored PodCamp Boston last year and should know better — makes zero effort to personalize her message. No mention of what we do at Monster. No attempt to find a match between the event she’s pitching and our career advice site or the Monster Blog, neither of which she bothered to research.
Finally, no links of any kind for me to check out her client’s event and associated product online.
Clearly, a disastrous pitch and one I should be forwarding to Kevin Dugan at the Bad Pitch Blog, right?
And yet, what we’re being pitched is intriguing. It’s funny. It’s a perfect fit for our blog, and potentially for our discussion forums as well. I simply wouldn’t be doing my job if ignored the message.
This post isn’t meant to justify lazy, brainless pitches. There are still best practices that should be followed, and I’ve written and podcasted about them in the past. But occasionally, someone can go about pitching all wrong and still win us over. It happens.
So to answer my own headline question: No, I’m not selling out. I’m being practical.
Technorati Tags: bad pitch, good pitch, Bad Pitch Blog
5 Responses
Doug Haslam
12|Oct|2007 1Well, Corporate (this shall be your new nickname btw), I guess it goes to show that a good topic/product/etc. can outshine the worst pitch.
That’s “can” not “will.” But you are right not to ignore the message because the pitch is awful.
btw: I happen to know you are not talking about my employer, Topaz Partners, which also sponsored PodCamp last year (and is returning to do so again for PodCamp 2).
Christopher S. Penn
12|Oct|2007 2Here’s a better question:
What does it mean to sell out?
Bryan
12|Oct|2007 3@Doug: I can confirm that Topaz is not the agency that sent me the good/bad pitch.
@Christopher: In this case, I’m conflicted between 1) valuing pitches that uphold best practices such as caring enough to address me by name and 2) Producing the best possible content for our sites. In this case, No. 2 trumped No. 1.
–Bryper Corporate
Eden Spodek
12|Oct|2007 4You’re not a sell-out. You’re being practical and thinking about your community.
Doesn’t it all boil down to content? If someone has a compelling product/service/story that makes sense for your audience, why would you ignore it just because the sender doesn’t employ best practices for blogger outreach? That would just be stubborn on your part.
However, I’d like to think the odds of a pitch being successful is greater if those people doing the pitching employ best practices. I am surprised that a company familiar with the social media space didn’t know better.
Jack Hodgson
20|Oct|2007 5You’re not simply being “practical” you’re doing your job well. Part of your job is to find good products, even in spite of bad PR. The PR people may have been sloppy, but if the product has merit then you’ve done your job, in spite of difficult circumstances.
Leave a reply
Search
Finding me elsewhere
Bryan Person's profile
Subscribe by e-mail
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Creative Commons license
This work by Bryan Person is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
A design creation of Design Disease
Copyright © 2007 - The Bryper Blog - is proudly powered by WordPress
InSense 1.0 Theme by Design Disease brought to you by HostGator Web Hosting.